advanced nescience for dummies; intellectual candy for your inner child if you'll just hop into the white van. Sorry Charlie, we want wisdom that's perverse, not perverts who are wise, although we'll probably take what we can get, as will Starkist now that there are no tuna, but that's a digression
Jung’s genius was too far in advance of his times–the Katzenjammer Kids are not really the cosmic archetype of humanity that Jung held them to be. Today we know that the KJ Kidz are just archetypes of happy-go-lucky people too young to know that they will grow up to fight for Hitler.
Jung’s other big mistake was that Hedy Lamarr was not that hot.
Then again, maybe Jung was on to something…
But Jung’s basic idea has regained credibility as we develop better archetypes and as we learn the algebra by which these archetypes can be combined to provide more accurate and dynamic psychological representations. Politics, and our “political personality,” being a caricature of reality (a really bad one), are especially reducible to a few fundamental archetypes:
Conservative utopia =
Tea Party vision of Utopia =
Liberal worldview (Being more complicated than conservatives, it takes three TV shows to encapsulate the liberal worldview, not just two):
Radical Feminist = Just Xena
Moderates: You might think they would be even more complicated than liberals, but they too can be summarized in just one TV show: Seinfeld. “Good luck with allthat in 2012!”